There has always been an ensuing debate within the Reformed community pertaining to apologetic methodology.

For academic purposes, I want to highlight an article by Paul Helm responding to Scott Oliphint’s book on Thomas Aquinas. One must view Helm and Oliphint as the two key interlocutors pertaining to the modern debate over Aquinas and Reformed methodology.

Helm’s response at Credo Mag can be found here: (part 1), (part 2), and (part 3).

Helm’s response on his personal blog, Helm’s Deep, can also be found here: (part 1), (part 2), and (part 3).